headermask image

header image

Cheap degrees are good

Arthur Brooks from the American Enterprise Institute recounts his college days for the NY Times Op-Ed page. Was it filled with raccoon coats, tea parties with brilliant professors and parking the dean’s Volvo in the chapel? Nope. He pieced his degree together from various correspondence schools and it all worked out okay. I suppose he could have worn a raccoon coat at home but I doubt it.

He writes:

I followed the 10K-B.A. with a 5K-M.A. at a local university while working full time, and then endured the standard penury of being a full-time doctoral fellow in a residential Ph.D. program. The final tally for a guy in his 30s supporting a family: three degrees, zero debt.

Did I earn a worthless degree? Hardly. My undergraduate years may have been bereft of frissons, but I wound up with a career as a tenured professor at Syracuse University, a traditional university. I am now the president of a Washington research organization.

Everyone criticizing the low-end degrees for somehow being less than the expensive ones, but I often wonder if that’s the case. I’ve found that the kids at the fanciest schools are often more interested in Raccoon Coats than their lessons. In many cases, all of the climbing walls and ass. deans are just distractions. Real learning happens when students sit down and read a book. Almost everything else is just distraction.

Share

If you liked my post, feel free to subscribe to my rss feeds

4 Comments so far (Add 1 more)

  1. Read the comments to Brooks’ article. Academia rose up as one angry NYTimes reader to condemn him for depriving the precious snowflakes of their opportunity to sit at the other end of the log from Aristotle, or, maybe to binge drink, random hook-up, and smoke dope.

    1. Walter Sobchak on February 5th, 2013 at 4:53 pm
  2. I dunno, I took a distance course from UC Extension 20 years ago and it was’t cheap. It was just as expensive as on-campus, only I didn’t have to move to California.

    2. carol on February 5th, 2013 at 4:54 pm
  3. BTW: Aristotle equilibrated with the environment 2300 years ago. No one in Academia, not even the under assistant dean of diversity who is being paid $234 K$/a, has a tiny fraction of the learning that Aristotle still has — today at 14 degrees C.

    3. Walter Sobchak on February 5th, 2013 at 4:58 pm
  4. Brooks is a bit “traditional” for me, but he’s one of the few elites not trying to solve everything with debasement and aircraft carriers. I’m surprised RAND ever worked with him.

    4. BB on February 6th, 2013 at 2:10 am