headermask image

header image

Loans get harder to get.

Repeat after me: “Duh.” David Cho of the Washington Post reports the tough news about college loans and then dances around the fundamental problem before concluding with a quote from some college president burdened by the last name Marx. The faculty at Amherst probably giggled when they voted him in as President because nothing warms the heart of a refugee from the real world like Karl Marx’s dream that someone else will pay for it. President Marx concludes:

“The big macro question is: Will we have to sacrifice the quality of education, or the access, based on talent rather than the ability to pay?” said Marx, the Amherst president. “Either of those make America less competitive for the next generation.”

Yeah. Sure. I bet. If the current generation doesn’t get steeped in cross-disciplinary biomimetical ethical post-modern linguistics, they’re not going to be able to compete with the kids in China and India who grow up thinking that you earn a salary by providing something the world needs like food, heat, or a roof.

Alas, the private credit markets are telling President Marx that they’re not going to gamble on the next generation of Amherst students making enough money to pay off their outrageous loans.

I’m willing to bet that the next generation will be even more competitive if they’re nurtured in underheated cinderblock dorms and taught by professors who are forced to develop the ability to teach by being allocated 3 or even– gasp– 4 courses in a semester.  I doubt Mr. Marx sees it the way I do, but he may be forced to because there’s no money out there. They’ve already overloaded the middle class students  with debt. They’ve already squeezed the parents into taking out second or third mortgages. They’ve jawboned the Federal government into pouring an endless stream of money into research. The state governments get pushed and pushed to fund campuses and the college presidents just keep raising the prices because they’re frickin addicted to paying for that assistant professor to skip teaching for a semester to go on a research gathering trip to Europe.

The only ones left who aren’t saving for a college education are the retirees and they’re pretty much tapped out. Good luck Mr. Marx.

  • Share/Bookmark

Related posts:

  1. Big loans, big problems
  2. “Surely, you have a Harvard degree. You’ll get a job.”
  3. $140,000 in loans tears apart a student
  4. Forgive student loans? One man dreams.
  5. Research Universities Ask Obama for More Money

If you liked my post, feel free to subscribe to my rss feeds

2 Comments so far (Add 1 more)

  1. But easy access to student loans has contributed greatly to the higher education bubble. In a true “free market,” what bank would lend an 18 year old kid – with little work history, no collateral, and tiny savings $10K-$30K a year to study American History?

    This is why enrollments have continued to go up, even though the cost of attending college and graduate schools has skyrocketed over the last 30 years. Schools then turn around and argue “supply and demand” – which is a fallacy since the demand is artificially created by the lending schemes in place.

    My blog and those on my blog list document the effect of student lending on the lawyer market, i.e. the ABA-approved law schools are continually producing FAR TOO MANY graduates than there are available attorney positions.

    Nando

    1. Nando on December 29th, 2009 at 3:54 am
  2. You’re absolutely right. The loans need to be made by sane people who know how much a college education might be worth. That’s not just for the benefit of the taxpayer, who’s backing these things up, but the person taking out the loan. It does no good to put too heavy a burden on someone’s back.

    2. admin on December 29th, 2009 at 2:43 pm

Post a Comment

Your email is never published nor shared. Required fields are marked *

*
*